Employee relations covering more than industrial relations these days and
it has given a new meaning for industrial relations (CIPD, 2019).
Further, it's covering what’s happening between management, trade unions, and
other officials while enabling collective agreements. Employee relations are
basically intended to establish certain laws, regulations, and agreements that
will govern the relationship. Employment and industrial
relations are only one important management concern, and there are significant
variations in how different organizations ' management interpret their roles
in industrial relations (Rose, 2004). Modern classification of the relationship between
workers speak of individual and collective relationships in the workplace, but
it always indicates the growing individualization of the employment
relationship due to increased individual rights and the weakening of the trade
union and its effect on employees
(Armstrong, 2014).
As Armstrong (2014) says, workers deserve primarily a ' good day's pay
for a fair day's work, ' and they want to have a say on their terms and
conditions of employment and how they organize their jobs. Also, it's noted that
employees are always looking for the best monetary and non-monetary offer
available on the market. Further, employers expect that they want workers to do what they
are told to do without costing them too much.
Employee relationship policies define what kind of management-employee
partnerships are required and how pay-work negotiations should be handled based
on the organization's ideology (Armstrong, 2010). The main goal of employee
relations policies should be to create and maintain a healthy, efficient,
corporate and trusting environment of employee relationships. Four main
approached to employee relations according to Armstrong (2014) are Adversarial,
Traditional, Partnership and Power sharing as explained before.
According to Stephen and Timothy (2002), the psychological contract is an unwritten agreement that happens between employees and employer which will
define mutual expectations as well as what both parties expect. The psychological contract is more than just a legal contract-regulated activity,
it stresses that there is much more to the relationship between employers and
employees (CIPD, 2019).
Trade unions could participate in the development of internal rules
either separately or in conjunction with management as spokesmen for working
groups in the company (Kelly, 2002). There are two main reasons why unions that
struggle to attract members either because they do not deliver the goods and
services that workers expect, or because they cannot maintain the standard or
social practice (Visser, 2002). As Flanders (1970) clarified, collective
bargaining would govern the structure of industrial relations as a social
process that "continuously turns conflicts into compromises in an orderly
fashion." The Commission of Donovan (1968:50) found that' collective
bargaining is the only way to conduct industrial relations'.The move from collectivism to
individualism was also supported by the wide-ranging legislative programs
designed to erode perceived trade union ' monopoly power, ' while at the same
time enhancing centralized management influence over the employment
relationship (Rose, 2004).
According to Ellis and Taylor (2017) discussion, employee voice,
area of conflict and trust are the 3 most important current developments in
employee relations. Evolving
innovations have a profound impact on the relationship between workers and the
effect is both positive and negative. Relationships among employees become
simpler and more system dependent on sophisticated implementation of software systems. Technological development drawbacks often impact workplace
relationships and can be managed by routinely engaging workers in the
cross-functional interaction forum and measuring employee satisfaction (Deogaonkar,
2013).
My final thoughts are that the goal of employee relations is all focused-on trust and visibility of everyone in an organization. Everyone is going to have a role to play and it is their shared responsibility. However, in order to get much closer and push towards that goal, everyone needs to work together. We will have to choose suitable approaches and techniques that best suit our own organizational culture while on this journey.
“By aligning the expectations of employees and employers, both can thrive, creating a workplace that meets the emotional and career needs of its occupants, as well as the business needs of the company” (Mullich, 2019).
My final thoughts are that the goal of employee relations is all focused-on trust and visibility of everyone in an organization. Everyone is going to have a role to play and it is their shared responsibility. However, in order to get much closer and push towards that goal, everyone needs to work together. We will have to choose suitable approaches and techniques that best suit our own organizational culture while on this journey.
“By aligning the expectations of employees and employers, both can thrive, creating a workplace that meets the emotional and career needs of its occupants, as well as the business needs of the company” (Mullich, 2019).
References
Armstrong, M. (2010). Armstrong's essential human resource management
practice. 1st ed. London: Kogan Page, pp.297,298,299,309.
Armstrong, M. (2014). Armstrong's handbook of human resource
management practice. 13th ed. London: Kogan Page, p.406.
Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development 2019, 16 May 2019,
London: Employee relations: an introduction [Online], Available at:https://www.cipd.co.uk/knowledge/fundamentals/relations/employees/factsheet#6053 [Accessed 22 August 2019].
Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development 2019, 12th February
2019, London: The Psychological Contract [Online], Available https://www.cipd.co.uk/knowledge/fundamentals/relations/employees/psychological-factsheet#6110 [Accessed 21 August 2019].
Deogaonkar, A. (2013). Emerging Technologies and Impact on Employee
Relations. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, [online] 3(9), pp.1, 2. Available at: http://www.ijsrp.org/research-paper-0913/ijsrp-p2176.pdf [Accessed 22 August 2019].
Kelly,
J. (2002). Industrial relations. 1st ed. London: Routledge, p.46.
Mullich, J. (2019). ADP BrandVoice: How To Close The Gap Between Employer And Employee Expectations. [online] Forbes.com. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/adp/2018/03/27/how-to-close-the-gap-between-employer-and-employee-expectations/#6dec207f20cf [Accessed 02 October 2019].
Rose, E. (2004). Employment relations. 2nd ed. London: Pearson Education, pp.9-664.
Mullich, J. (2019). ADP BrandVoice: How To Close The Gap Between Employer And Employee Expectations. [online] Forbes.com. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/adp/2018/03/27/how-to-close-the-gap-between-employer-and-employee-expectations/#6dec207f20cf [Accessed 02 October 2019].
Rose, E. (2004). Employment relations. 2nd ed. London: Pearson Education, pp.9-664.
Stephen, P. and Timothy, A. (2013). Organizational
Behavior. 15th ed. Boston: Pearson, p.278.
Visser,
J. (2002). Why Fewer Workers Join Unions in Europe: A Social Custom
Explanation of Membership Trends. British Journal of Industrial Relations,
40(3), pp.403-430.