Trade Union recognition
According to Kelly (2002), a trade union is an external organization
with respect to a business enterprise. Further, it’s a separate social system
which isn’t part of its organizational social system, however the membership of
the two can overlap. Farnham (1997) further
explains that trade union strategy should point the ways in which unions adapt
their policies and objectives and in response to changing economic and social
factors, employer initiatives and the framework of public policy within which
employers and unions operate, they should adjust their means and methods.
They may participate in the making of internal rules either separately or
jointly with management as spokesmen of workgroups in the enterprise. Also,
they have a responsibility for enforcing its rules or the agreement that it has
entered into with employers as representatives of their union (Kelly, 2002). Two
main reasons why unions can fail to attract members are either because they
don’t deliver the goods and services that workers expect, or they are unable to
uphold the norm or social custom, which, in the absence of coercion, assures
that a sufficient number of workers share in the cost of producing these goods
and services (Visser, 2002). As per my own working experience, I have only been
included once in a trade union out of six places I have worked so far and most
of these new companies don’t have a trade union recognition as they are more
focused on individual needs.
Below chart is taken from the annual report done by Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy of UK Government on trade union statistics in the year 2019,
Below chart is taken from the annual report done by Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy of UK Government on trade union statistics in the year 2019,
Figure 3: Trade union
density by sector, 1995 to 2018
(GOV.UK, 2019)
According to this chart, there is a clear decline
of trade union membership over the years in both the private and public sectors.
Collective bargaining
Collective bargaining will regulate the industrial relations system, as
explained by Flanders (1970) as a social process that ‘continually turns disagreements
into agreements in an orderly fashion’.Trade unions had steady growth through the first part of the twentieth
century along with employer recognition of trade unions and public policy
support for collective bargaining. Donovan Commission (1968:50) had a
conclusion that ‘collective bargaining is the best method of conducting
industrial relations’. Further, it is noted that multi-employer, industry-wide
bargaining was not capable of imposing its decisions on the participants. Therefore,
they recommended taking the initiative and responsibility for reforming
collective bargain at company and plant levels by that management (Farnham,1997).
My own experience is those collective bargaining methods are far more suitable
for both employers and employees to come to certain agreements and works well
being able to achieve expected results. Collective bargaining, and particularly
multi-employer bargaining persisted throughout the 1990s and early 2000s in an
almost inexorable decline. Further, according to WERS98, multi-employer bar-gaining
influenced the wages of some or all workers in 34% of recognized trade union
workplaces in 1998, compared to 68% in 1980 and 60% in 1990 (Rose, 2004).
Ultimately,
HRM has been viewed as an open anti-union management strategy or as increasing
the satisfaction of workers to reduce their need for unions. Besides, its
beneficial effects on organizational performance should ensure that wage increases and other non-pecuniary gains are received by workers (Frege and Kelly, 2013). The
employment relationship is concerned in part with groups of employees
represented by trade unions. Therefore, the character of this representation is
collective. Further, Employees who are collectively represented by trade unions
may have greater power to influence decisions, such as pay levels and working
conditions, than employees who are not members of trade unions (Rose, 2004).
References
Farnham, D. (1997). Employee relations in context. 2nd ed. London: Institute of
Personnel Management, pp.33,287.
Flanders, A. (1970). Management and unions. London:
Faber.
Frege, C. and Kelly, J. (2013). Comparative Employment Relations in the Global Economy. 1st ed. London: Routledge, p. 1 of chapter 6.
Kelly, J. (2002). Industrial relations. 1st ed. London: Routledge, p.46.
Rose, E. (2004). Employment relations. 2nd ed. London: Pearson Education, pp.4-667.
Frege, C. and Kelly, J. (2013). Comparative Employment Relations in the Global Economy. 1st ed. London: Routledge, p. 1 of chapter 6.
GOV.UK. (2019). Trade union statistics. [online] Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/trade-union-statistics [Accessed 10 Sep. 2019].
Kelly, J. (2002). Industrial relations. 1st ed. London: Routledge, p.46.
Rose, E. (2004). Employment relations. 2nd ed. London: Pearson Education, pp.4-667.
Visser, J. (2002). Why Fewer Workers Join Unions in Europe: A Social Custom Explanation of
Membership Trends. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 40(3), pp.403-430.